2019 spring usfn report “Recent Cases Help to Interpret the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act”

It is with great pleasure to announce that the following article has been published in the 2019 Spring USFN Report. https://www.usfn.org/blogpost/1296766/323601/Recent-Cases-Help-to-Interpret-the-Fair-Debt-Collection-Practices-Act

Partner and USFN Member, William H. Meyer shares eight cases that helped interpret the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act.

  1. Property Preservation is Not Debt Collection Under FDCPA — Schlaf v. Safeguard Prop., LLC, 899 F.3d459 (7th Cir. 2018)
  2. Safe Harbor Language in a Debt Collector’s Notice to a Borrower Does Not Protect the Debt Collector from Misleading Information Also Contained in the Notice – Boucher v. Fin. Sys. of Green Bay, 880 F.3d 362 (7th Cir. 2018)
  3. A Technical Violation of the FDCPA’s Mini-Miranda Requirement is Not Always Actionable – Hagyv. Demers & Adams, 882 F.3d 616 (6th Cir. 2018)
  4. Debt Collector’s Failure to Notify a Borrower that a Debt Dispute Must Be Made in Writing is Actionable Under the FDCPA – Macy v. GC Srvs. L.P., 897 F.3d 747 (6th Cir. 2018)
  5. Debt Collector’s Failure to Notify a Borrower that a Debt Dispute Must Be Made in Writing is Actionable Under the FDCPA – Macy v. GC Srvs. L.P., 897 F.3d 747 (6th Cir. 2018)
  6. A Debt Collector’s Duty to Verify a Debt is Very Limited – Walton v. EOS CCA, 885 F.3d 1024 (7th Cir. 2018)
  7. The Federal Circuits Are Split on When the FDCPA’s One-Year Statute of Limitations Period Begins to Run – Rotkiske v. Klemm, 890 F.3d 422 (3rd Cir. 2018)
  8. Tax Collection is Not Debt Collection Under the FDCPA – St. Pierre v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc., 898 F.3d 351 (3rd Cir. 2018)

  • Posted by Veronica Medrano
  • On May 9, 2019

0 Comments